Posts Tagged With: Declaration of Independence

Freedom Dies Without You

“We tend to assume that our American legacy promises us liberty and the pursuit of happiness—no questions asked. But I learned from my reading of the founders’ work that just as you aren’t promised freedom in the American contract without the reciprocal expectation that you will risk yourself to defend freedom, so you aren’t promised happiness or even the purely self-regarding right to pursue happiness. That’s a myth.” – Naomi Wolf, Give Me Liberty

Many people think democracy is some sort of self-propagating institution. Once set in motion, it needs little guidance or attention. This couldn’t be further from the truth. As soon as people stop paying attention, those in power abuse their power. A small amount of bureaucrats can shape, influence, undermine and destroy the people’s rights. Once it starts, it slowly gets worse, a little at a time. In modern times, this has been referred to as moving the Overton Window. The Founders of the United States understood this well. It’s embedded in the Declaration of Independence.

As Naomi Wolf writes, the Declaration’s language:

“…is quite difficult; it is the formal language of a very formal time far removed from our own…We tend to think that the Declaration intends something pleasant and benign…but it turns out the Declaration of Independence is about our continual duty as Americans to rebel…[its] first long sentence asserts the ‘right to revolution.'”

In fact, the Declaration “…charges us categorically and always as Americans to rise up in person against threats to liberty.”

Democracy is not a natural state. It requires attention, participation, protest — and when necessary — restoration.

Paying attention only on election day is to not pay attention at all. If you are too busy to understand and protect democracy, you will lose your freedom. Many in history have awoken to an oppressive government, only to ask, “How did it come to this?”

Categories: government, History | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

A Republic at Risk

When the 1776 Commission was created to produce the The 1776 Report, the normal mindless, partisan politics ensued. The report couldn’t possibly be of importance and was ignored and deleted. So I, unlike many others, decided to actually read it. Here, quoted from the report, is what it was fundamentally about:

The core assertion of the Declaration [of Independence], and the basis of the founders’ political thought, is that “all men are created equal.”

[This] does not mean that all human beings are equal in wisdom, courage, or any of the other virtues and talents that God and nature distribute unevenly among the human race. It means rather that human beings are equal in the sense that they are not by nature divided into castes, with natural rulers and ruled.

Natural equality requires not only the consent of the governed but also the recognition of fundamental human rights…as well as the fundamental duty or obligation of all to respect the rights of others. These rights are found in nature and are not created by man or government; rather, men create governments to secure natural rights. Indeed, the very purpose of government is to secure these rights, which exist independently of government, whether government recognizes them or not.

…the Ninth Amendment [establishes] that the Bill of Rights was a selective and not an exclusive list; that is, the mere fact that a right is not mentioned in the Bill of Rights is neither proof nor evidence that it does not exist.

In other words, the Declaration of Independence is a statement of the ancient belief that human rights are innate and exist whether or not any particular government thinks otherwise. These were the founding principles of the United States, all of which used to be taught in schools. That was a primary purpose of schools after all. The report writes:

Education in civics, history, and literature holds the central place in the well-being of both students and communities. For republican government, citizens with such an education are essential. The knowledge of human nature and unalienable rights — understanding what it means to be human — brings deeper perspective to public affairs, for the simple reason that educated citizens will take encouragement or warning from our past in order to navigate the present.

When the lessons of the past are ignored, the truth of natural rights ignored, and politicians try to undo or work around checks and balances of power, this is cause for great concern. When these cancers began to eat away at a republic, often hidden behind movements and catchphrases that hide the decay, one day people wake up wondering how their government moved into tyranny. History, however, tells us how easy governments can fail:

Republicanism is an ancient form of government, but one uncommon throughout history, in part because of its fragility, which has tended to make republics short-lived. Contemporary Americans tend to forget how historically rare republicanism has been, in part because of the success of republicanism in our time…

We only need to look to that famous republic, the Roman one, and its slide into tyranny, and the warnings it has left us. Edward Watts in Mortal Republic writes:

A republic is not an organism. It has no natural life span. It lives or dies solely on the basis of choices made by those in charge of its custody…The [Roman] Republic could have been saved. These men, and many others less famous as they, chose not to save it…When citizens take the health and durability of their republic for granted, that republic is at risk.

The 1776 Report wasn’t a partisan document; it was a warning. As Daniel Webster wrote, if the American experiment fails, “there will be anarchy throughout the world.”

Categories: Critical Thinking, History | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.